Tuesday, March 31, 2009

The Emergent Church, Clint Eastwood, & Gran Torino

Post modernism...
Modernity...
Religion...
Anti - Religion...
Coexistence Theology...

I was speaking with my wife the other night about the emergent Church, because she is taking a class on it and would like some insight as to what I thought about it. Well, I told her to be honest, I don't know much about it but I'll tell you what I know and what I think.

So, to discuss about it, i had done some investigating on the subject, not in depth, but some overall broad spectrum understanding of it. The best description I got was from a pastor friend of mine who stated in a nutshell, that first the emerging church and the emergent church is in fact two different things, even though for the most part they are associated as the same thing. Mostly due to superficial reasons in the way the two churches would look on the outside. However, the core of it is quite different. The emergent church of which is getting more buzz, is based on a more emotionally based ideology, dash of facts, and a generalized pinch of the Gospel. Main focus claiming to be the christ centered model but in a more 21st century, emo - mtv style mode. Instead of worship, it's more like a discussion and debate about the efficacy of Christ and the Church, and is seemingly designed to be a open door policy to allow parishiners the freedom to be right in their own right. Sort of like, trying not to step on anyones toes as to the fear that non - christians will have a bad taste in their mouths and in turn make up stonewalled choices about the followers of Christ. The emerging church, on the other hand, is more about a Gospel centered, free understanding, inclusive idea with 21st century formats. Less about offending, more about worshipping, and deeper believing in the idea that it's not about being politically correct, but more about being truly Christ - centered.

Now, this is my very general understanding of the differences, but there may be more to it than that. Yet, from what I hear of the two, from the pastors, wiki's, forums, and laypeoples, the story seems to be the same. It's a church that is trying to be more hip, in, and of the times. Less about being a church and more about the church breaking societal norms and preconceived notions of Christianity. Bottom line, a 'religion' that is more easily swallowable, and acceptible in a world that is more well informed and 'intelligent.'

So, I began running into an issue with this whole thing. If Christ, God, and the Church are supposed to be blessed, in a world that is cast in darkness, than why the need for the essential catering of the masses to allow God's precepts to be palatable? Are people so sensitive to the matters of faith that we now have to tip toe around such subjects? Have we as a peoples become so in tune with the 'universe' that we rationalize that all religions must be the same, because they all seem to preach about the same things?

This questioning in my own right brought me to a conversation I had with a close friend about the film Gran Torino directed by Clint Eastwood. Crass, in your face, quintessential Eastwood. Brother told me that in a nutshell, the film was about how the world had gone soft, that no one has the capability to take cynacism and insults like they used to. Why would a movie such as this be needed? How many of you out there that are reading this noticed the trend in favorite movies being that the subjects of revenge, Righteous anger, leveling the playing field under insurmountable odds, being the most watched. Everyone, in my opinion, have indeed become soft, and I catch myself in this mode as well at times. Being politically correct and sensitive to emotions as become paramount to society than I dare say health itself. Yet, impressing on the masses the ideologies of Love, Hope, & sometimes Faith are now, no longer sacred nor necassary, but rather what you just say (without spiritual underpinnings.) Some one is down right pissed off at the current predicament, and what do people tell you now, 'aw~ it's okay, it'll all be okay, I will sympathize with you, I will share your pain, I will do my best to let you know that I will 'love' on you.' Now, this sounds like the humane thing to do, right? Yet, is it still right. Can a person truly feel the pain of another, and except all that comes with it. The baggage, the yelling inside, the yelling outside, the rage, the pain, and the endless tissues that will make a person raw in the nasal orifices to the point of a leperous - like deformation. Are we willing to make the sacrifices that entail such a task as sharing in the pain of someone that we care about? Then from another point of view are we dumbing ourselves, of our spirituality by allowing others the oppurtunity to even make a relativly empty statement such as the above? Has human kind become so left in the dark of the world that we forget that there is an almighty God, that once and technically still is ruling over the know understanding of the presence and plain we live in.

We are so stuck in the idea that we can't harm, and also so quick as to love, yet without the full understanding of what it means to love. Love as now be brought down to the level of just something that we are supposed to do because that's what we as a people are supposed to do. Being 'PC' about things as become the main religion of the masses. The most prolific and fastest growing religion in my opinion today, is the church of atheism and apathy with non Christian spritualist coming in at a close 2nd.

So what is a church to do now that the world hates the Christians? Oh, I guess now we just fall in line with the rest of the world and make Christ more politically correct, afterall, the bible was written couple thousands of years ago, and the cultures of the times were so much more different back then. This is what I hear from the mouths of my fellow believers and non believers as well. The justification of the Gospel, becoming p.c. is that the gospel is antiquated?!?! So, now churches are moving in a direction to make Christ kool with a K. Next thing you know, I'll start seeing new modern translations of the new testament with Jesus spelled alittle more like this:

j35U2

We are doomed as a society, when we begin to water down and modernify the things that we once held as sacred. Sacred in today's world to some degree has become nothing more than a phrase uttered in a museum that hold sacred artifacts of past religions. I believe that the people of the world today have become soft, are afraid of the impacts that one's own faith will have on the environment around them, and are weakened by the effects of mass media and the rampant rise of over spirituality that is to some degree very reminescent of the late 60's.

Love of course being it's main focus. A universal idea indeed but having the ability to permeate and be used in so many levels. Both beautiful and frightning at the same time. 'The devil's best trick is to persuade you that he doesn't exist.' - Baudelarie Yes, I know that the Usual Suspects movie made it popular again, but the phrase was taken for the poet above. C.S. Lewis wrote a book called the Screwtape Letters, being about a series of letters written by a lower ranking deamon to it's mentor deamon. The goes in depth in the wily was that the engine of sin is used, and the tools that the deamon utilizes in the best of people to further pull the eyes of man away from God, even using God himself. So perhaps Love is what's being used again to further pull the eyes of the world away from God. Because love is so grand, it's soft, pretty and fluffy like a cat. >.< Well, perhaps it's time that people stopped looking into the looking glass and started taking a look at the world for the way it really is.

So Here is my bold statement to the world. This is not my preaching for those who are sensitive to the ways of the Christian world with aberration. I am a Christian, a follower of Christ. I believe with all my heart, mind and soul that Jesus Christ is in fact the son of God, and died for my sins, and the sins of the world. This is the way it is, this is the way it will be, and that's what I will be. So at the risk of being 'emergent' (like my overuse of quotes) I am not preaching to you reader, I am not trying to subversively brainwash you into the world of Christ, nor am I a deceiver of religion, I am plain, and out there, take it or leave, I have no worries if you don't accept and I don't mind if you don't agree, That choice is yours to make not mine, if anything I have no power, the true power is in God almighty and I am but a mere servant and follower of his way. If you think I'm rude, sorry, but in the world that I live in I try to be a real as possible, I fail at times like most of you, and at times I succeed in the day. So, I suppose that best that we can do is hope for the best, stick to our guns, and have true faith. So be happy that you are alive today, why shouldn't it be the best day of your life, since God allowed you to have another day ^^

- Peace

1 comments:

  1. i, also, do not know much about the emergent church other than from hearing from my pastors and fellow co-workers in the ministry. the idea of emerging with the culture, watering down the Gospel to be politically correct, modernization.. to me, its non-sense. hello to the world, the Gospel is offensive. if your mind is closed and your heart is hard, it's gonna be offensive to you. do we as christians leave it at that? no. but to tiptoe around the truth in order to bandage up a problem without cutting to the root issues is exact opposite of what it means to follow Christ. in this day and age, people are not going to accept Christ. it's the sad truth. it's still our duty to get the word out there. it's our primary job. in all that we do. to show we are different from how we are protrayed. yet, God does the saving. Christ is salvation. i'm not trying to say that we should discard every aspect of our culture, but Jesus was countercultural. He was a rebel. not only that, he transformed culture. maybe we should start being "rebellious" and actually read our bibles instead of catering to what non-christians want to hear.

    and to your comment on love (which i agree).. we are to love, but sometimes, love hurts. prime example of discipline. you are reprimanded by your parents for doing something wrong because you are loved. it's not this frilly, emotional, hippy, soft, whatever whatever that is protrayed by "christians" or other people out there. there are times for that. but i'm tired of the whole "God is love, and hippy Jesus with a lamb on his shoulder, and let's go frolicking in the meadows, put a bandage on your booboo cuz its okay whatever you do" dont get me wrong, God is love. but he is also just. he is sovereign and good. let's remember those too.

    ReplyDelete